Full Transcript of the Fact Mission's Documentary about the CDC's original Hepatitis B vaccine trials

Summary

The documentary claims that CDC scientists withheld long-term trial data that could show higher rates of death, serious illness, and HIV among people who received an early hepatitis B vaccine compared with placebo recipients. Publicly available studies do not show higher rates in the vaccinated group, and no public long-term vaccine-versus-placebo breakdown was found. Because the study was taxpayer funded, the documentary is calling for the CDC to release the results through FOIA.

Full transcipt of the documentary

00:00:00 Speaker 1

I'm going to show you the names and photos of 10 respected US scientists and health officials. I've engaged with over the past few years. I have been urging them to release the results of a taxpayer funded study to irrefutably settle a notorious vaccine safety concern. I've offered to redact their names from this presentation one condition :, if they can find just one among their ranks with the courage to answer this obvious question the public record.

00:00:28 Speaker 2

In the long- term follow- up to the CDC's original hepatitis B vaccine trials, Was the rate of death and terminal illness significantly higher in the vaccinated participants versus the unvaccinated participants given a placebo?

00:00:44 Speaker 1

My aim is to convince you that a small group of elite scientists whose salaries are paid by, you has no right to withhold the data that lawfully belongs to you simply because they've decided you can't handle the truth. Once you understand the incredible events surrounding this data, You'll understand why getting them to answer on the record is a mountain I am absolutely willing to die on. It will not only settle vaccine safety concerns, it is actually our best hope at halting the global march towards surveillance, censorship and centralized control. Okay, that's a bold claim but with so much at stake please hear me out.

00:01:25 Speaker 1

At the center of this controversy is Doctor Paul Offit, named Time Magazine's Vaccine Champion. Listen to Doctor Offit explain why, despite the significantly increased risk of vaccinating post- COVID recovery, He and a small group of experts still forced those of us with natural immunity to comply. In.

00:01:45 Speaker 3

February of twenty twenty two I was asked with three other immunology virology types to participate in a conference call about whether or not. Natural infection should count as a vaccine. That meeting was held with Rochelle Walensky, Tony Fauci. We voted on it and it was sort of two to two basically. I mean, I was one of the, I think natural infection should count for obvious reasons. I mean, actually you're making an immune response to all four viral proteins. You in many ways make a broader cytotoxic T-cell response. I think you're better off in many ways while we all basically agreed, I think that it would it should count that the question was bureaucratically. Would it work?

00:02:23 Speaker 3

Because I was already getting out there saying, "I think we should target high risk groups, ", but where I was getting a lot of pushback from from public health, people who felt that I had gotten off the bus. Because see, that was the whole feeling in this. You know, You are either on the bus or off the bus, and there was no in between. So I'd gotten yeah. I said, "I said Tony am I wrong? Am I wrong in making?" He said, "No you are right. We should target high risk groups." He said, "The problem is minute you say that um." It becomes a nuanced message and a nuanced message is a garbled message. If you really want to make sure those groups get vaccinated, then you recommend it for everybody. And and okay so where.

00:02:58 Speaker 1

I live in Colombia, natural immunity did count. My recent and severe bout of COVID exempted me from mandates. However, to work on a project in the US, neither natural immunity nor Colombia's traditional inactivated viral vaccines counted. I was forced to get the mRNA shot. I complied. Hours later, I suffered an extreme inflammatory reaction that crushed my inner ear, leaving me with permanent hearing loss and cardiac damage. A couple of months later, It triggered shingles, causing nerve damage. And years later, my hands and feet are still painful blocks of ice. Since Doctor Offit confessed to his natural immunity deception that many of us blame for our COVID vaccine injuries, we have to ask:

00:03:46 Speaker 1

What about the other vaccines? In his book, Offit reveals that the original hepatitis B vaccine similarly used novel technology and was actually abandoned due to widespread accusations of harm. He insists those concerns were proven invalid because the CDC tested that vaccine in a gold standard, double blind, randomized, placebo, controlled trial. He writes that in the ten year follow up There was no difference in adverse outcomes between those who had or hadn't received Merck's vaccine. That sounds like proof that the fears were invalid and the original vaccine was as safe as the placebo. Based on that reasoning, the modern hepatitis B vaccine was not tested against a placebo; rather, the placebo in the clinical trial was the original vaccine abandoned over.

00:04:43 Speaker 1

Supposedly unfounded safety concerns. Offit is the key figure insisting that it would be cruel and unethical for a vaccine trial to give half of participants a true placebo. If another vaccine exists, that could be used as the control, thus giving everyone protection. That might seem logical, but it's contradicted by last year's documentary An Inconvenient Study. It highlighted a Henry Ford Institute finding that vaccinated children are two point five times. More likely to suffer from chronic health conditions. The institute withheld their findings, arguing their retrospective study was less conclusive than a gold standard prospective study, namely the one Offit claims proved the vaccine was safe. But note the semantic loophole in Offit's ambiguous choice of words. He conspicuously avoided using the word placebo. Therefore those who.

00:05:40 Speaker 1

Hadn't received Merck's vaccine may not have been trial participants. Technically, It could even refer to some unspecified cohort given a competing vaccine made by someone else. This leaves open the possibility that the CDC's trial participants given a placebo were much healthier than those given Merck's vaccine, So the scientists compared outcomes against an unrelated cohort, given a different vaccine that was also dangerous. And that would mean the fears over the original vaccine were valid, And the flawed abandoned vaccine set the bar dangerously low when it was used as the placebo to test the safety of today's vaccine. It would mean parents may be doing the unthinkable and harming their children on the first day of life. I risk sounding like a conspiracy theorist for even suggesting our trusted health leaders resorted to such trickery. However, if they're being honest,

00:06:39 Speaker 1

Then they won't hesitate to answer this question to eliminate the ambiguity. If they refuse, you can reasonably assume the answer is actually yes, Making it pretty clear that they are deceiving us and that the CDC's definitive gold standard study actually validates rather than contradicts the Henry Ford study and that they are putting all children at risk to protect the pharmaceutical industry. After my vaccine injury, I wasn't giving anyone the benefit of the doubt. I filed a Freedom of Information Act request and have been traveling to meet anyone willing to touch this topic, including the involved scientists, their colleagues and even their families. I'm dedicating my life to getting them to state out loud the answer, they only dare whisper. Once you hear the backstory, You'll understand a yes, would definitely rewrite history and have the power to reshape the future.

00:07:35 Speaker 1

So here's how we get there. Chapter one covers the critical flaw in the vaccine's design, and chapter two explores the CDC's ten year follow up to calculate any harm. I will then confront the scientists withholding the data needed to answer this question. I'll explain how your life will change by compelling them to answer it. If you're up for a deeper dive, the second half dismantles their counter arguments. This presentation prioritizes substance over spectacle You won't see C G I graphics, talking heads or opinions here. Just a minimalist forensic examination of the scientists' own research papers. The only A I will be the narration. I am hopeful this will be the ultimate wake up call, exposing the grave harm inflicted by the institutions. Now demanding the power to control what we say, think and do.

00:08:39 Speaker 4

Re Cognizing that the source of the vaccine at that time was going to be blood from people who were carriers, they were infected. Of course you're handling blood that came from people with hepatitis B infection, which can kill you.

00:08:57 Speaker 5

It required a whole new concept of how does one make, Such a vaccine safe.

00:09:06 Speaker 3

He had to take human blood. He then had to make sure that any possible virus that could have been in there was killed. He had to take this one protein, hepatitis B surface antigen and purify it.

00:09:18 Speaker 4

He exposed the material that was going to be the end product to three steps that would kill any known virus: formaldehyde, pepsin and urea.

00:09:34 Speaker 3

And thus we had the so- called plasma- derived hepatitis B vaccine, A vaccine that was made from no doubt the most dangerous starting material that we ever used, that I would argue created the safest vaccine we've ever used.

00:09:47 Speaker 2

You have the responsibility that you might do harm. This is not something for for the faint- hearted.

00:09:55 Speaker 5

Human hepatitis B vaccine represents the most technically complex, Of any vaccine developed to date.

00:10:04 Speaker 3

Only he had the intelligence and guts and resources to do that. I don't think anybody else would have made that vaccine. It was on the market for five years and it saved lives. But.

00:10:16 Speaker 6

The use of human blood continued to scare people, and those fears would simmer until they had cause to boil over. A new disease known as acquired immune deficiency syndrome, AIDS, was first identified about 18 months ago, And now has public health officials worried.

00:10:33 Speaker 3

Researchers are now studying blood and other samples from the victims, trying to learn what is causing the disease. It is spreading rapidly, cause and treatment unknown. It is a medical puzzle of enormous proportions.

00:10:45 Speaker 2

When the AIDS epidemic broke, of course that really begged the question about using whole blood in a vaccine.

00:10:51 Speaker 4

The cause of AIDS wasn't known at the time, but the fear was that perhaps there might be contamination. Of the vaccine with whatever caused AIDS.

00:11:06 Speaker 6

Use of the vaccine waned, And Hillemann was powerless to prove its safety until the cause of AIDS was finally determined by 1984. Health Secretary Margaret Heckler made the announcement to a jammed news conference. The probable cause of AIDS has been found. And she introduced the scientist who led the team, Doctor Robert Gallo. A test is available for blood banks, The reagents are available to characterize anything now, and a method is available to isolate this virus routinely. Gallo and others identified HIV, human immunodeficiency virus as the cause of AIDS. And Hilleman quickly showed that it was incapable of surviving his inactivation process. The vaccine was safe, But still he found himself up against an enemy, he could not defeat with science.

00:11:56 Speaker 3

He was dealing with perception more than reality. And the perception was that that HIV was sort of hanging over this vaccine like a cloud, Even though he had proven clearly that HIV couldn't possibly survive the treatments that he had subjected that vaccine to. So ultimately, he had to abandon it.

00:12:15 Speaker 7

The crucial point is this:. They could have definitively settled the controversy simply by disclosing the rate of AIDS in the trial's vaccine arm. Versus the control arm that received a placebo instead. But they withheld that data. Instead, They ask us to trust the experts and accept that HIV could not possibly survive Merck's rigorous chemical inactivation process using formaldehyde, pepsin and urea. It's true that HIV did not survive that process, but they omitted the key point touched on in Offit's own book:

00:12:50 Speaker 7

The costly pepsin and urea steps were bypassed in the version used for thirty years in sub-. S ahar an Africa and Southeast Asia after it was tested for five years on the US gay community. Offit's biography of Merck's vaccine head explained,

00:13:07 Speaker 3

Although Hilliman's tirades were legendary, one meeting stands apart from all the rest. Hilliman's explosion resulted from the confluence of several events when Hilliman was making his hepatitis B vaccine. He was adamant that his method of inactivation be followed precisely. If not, he feared that children might be injected with live, deadly hepatitis B virus. But Hillemann's research group didn't make the vaccine; Merck's manufacturing division did, and the manufacturing division was controlled by the unions. Hillemann, who demanded total control, didn't control the employees who made his vaccines. On August fifteenth, nineteen eighty, the rumble turned into a roar.

00:13:44 Speaker 3

Hilleman found out that someone in the manufacturing division, in hopes of increasing production, had slightly changed his chemical inactivation process for hepatitis B vaccine.

00:13:54 Speaker 7

Fortunately, there's a paper trail. In late nineteen seventy eight, Gay men in New York and California began developing highly unusual Kaposi's sarcoma lesions dubbed gay cancer. Note this critical anomaly. Sixty percent of San Francisco's earliest AIDS cases were concentrated within one specific cohort, the San Francisco City Clinic Cohort Study. This cohort was established in late nineteen seventy seven to archive blood samples from gay men to study hepatitis B in advance of the vaccine trials. Incredibly, while this cohort made up only a tiny fraction of the city's gay community, it contained the lion's share of early cases.

00:14:39 Speaker 7

And was the epicenter of the outbreak. Within one year, AIDS symptoms appeared, and the men began dying the following year in nineteen seventy nine. New York had created a similar cohort of thirteen thousand gay men that began years earlier in nineteen seventy four. From these cohorts, recruits, men with no prior hepatitis infection were enrolled in the clinical vaccine trials. Which began in New York in November nineteen seventy eight. At random, half received the Merck vaccine, while the other half remained unvaccinated, being given only a placebo. These would be the last major vaccine trials to leave a large number of unvaccinated participants, And thus, the last to allow the gold standard long term follow up of vaccine versus placebo. In March nineteen eighty.

00:15:34 Speaker 7

The C D C expanded the trials to gay men in five cities, largely in California. Several months later, the same month that Hillerman launched his tirade, The immunodeficiency that emerged in that hepatitis B study cohort also began appearing in hemophiliacs, who had received factor eight. Investigators noted, the only common link was that the gay men had donated blood plasma, and the hemophiliacs had received a pharmaceutical made from the plasma.

00:16:04 Speaker 7

They proposed the disease was caused by something injected. Understand, The factor eight lots causing AIDS were made from the same plasma pools as Hillemann's vaccine. As Offit noted, against this backdrop, Hillerman was adamant that his purification process with pepsin, urea and formaldehyde be followed precisely. To be clear, AIDS emerged a couple months before the phase three trial. And none of the early AIDS cases were participants, nor had they received Hillemann's vaccine. Rather, they were in the study cohort, the men excluded from the trial for prior infection, whose blood was being harvested to make Hillemann's future vaccine lots. That explains his concern over increasing yield with a shortcut to the three chemical process. A few months before Hillemann's tirade, Russian scientists had claimed a serious problem with the vaccine was that.

00:17:01 Speaker 7

Up until that point, it relied on only heat and just one chemical, formaldehyde. They warned the data suggested that formaldehyde alone may not be fully reliable at inactivating infectious viruses. They openly mocked the Western assumption that any harmful consequences of vaccination of humans would have been apparent in the chimpanzees used to make the vaccine. During the nineteen eighty symposium in Paris. French scientists were on the fence. They candidly admitted,"

00:17:33 Speaker 8

An absolutely and unequivocally safe vaccine has really never existed. Although hepatitis B vaccination must be considered more dangerous than other usual vaccination, Until now, no direct evidence of any serious immunopathological manifestation has ever been established in our chimpanzees."

00:17:55 Speaker 7

Scientists at Anthony Fauci's agency, Explained the critical role that chimpanzees played in this vaccine's development.

00:18:02 Speaker 9

The chimpanzee model for hepatitis B has made possible the development of vaccines to prevent this disease despite the inability to propagate the virus in vitro.

00:18:11 Speaker 7

Understand, in the nineteen sixties, polio vaccines used monkeys. One maker explained the problem with the monkey model.

00:18:20 Speaker 10

This monkey virus called S V forty, Ha s been isolated not only from many batches of livepoliovirus vaccines, but also from several lots of killed virus vaccine. It is clear that tissues obtained from the next batch of killed monkeys may contain more virus surprises.

00:18:40 Speaker 7

Hundreds of millions became infected throughpolio vaccines, But the maker confessed it was impossible to prevent because although the virus caused cancer in human cells. It didn't cause symptoms in the monkeys. Alfred Prince of the New York Blood Center explained why that wouldn't happen with the industry's pivot to chimpanzees for hepatitis B vaccine production.

00:19:04 Speaker 11

The previously accepted distinction between man as human and the chimpanzee as animal is becoming blurred. Biologically, It would appear that chimpanzees differ from man little more than one man does from another. Serum proteins are so similar, clearly, The biochemical and immunologic data provide little basis for separation of these species.

00:19:26 Speaker 7

Prince was so convinced the manzee in his autobiography refers to his account of attempting to father a hybrid. They called these experiments quote,

00:19:36 Speaker 11

A way the chimps pay their dues to a society that is saving them from extinction.

00:19:41 Speaker 7

In his nineteen seventy two patent filing, Prince revealed that he had added chimpanzee blood plasma, To N Y B C's human plasma pools. N Y B C was a major supplier of plasma to the industry. Prince disclosed the unique antigenic fingerprint of this human chimp plasma pool. It's a match for plasma pools used by their customers to make vaccines that year, including Merck. Fauci's scientists dismissed cross- species risks, confirming the.

00:20:13 Speaker 9

Immunological identity between human and chimpanzee.

00:20:17 Speaker 7

Back in Paris, eight years later, Those French scientists voiced concerns over Prince's N Y B C B Vax containing a mixture of viral and host proteins. They warned it might transmit infectious agents. However, Fauci's scientists doubled down, Insisting that.

00:20:36 Speaker 9

Vaccine lots are noninfectious for transmissible agents because each chimpanzee is then carefully monitored for at least six months for evidence of infection.

00:20:46 Speaker 7

The W H O backed Fauci's scientists and agreed that as long as vaccine makers used asymptomatic chimpanzees, they would be able to prevent a disaster. However, The tone was quite different when the W H O soon brought them together again in Athens. That symposium opened with Fauci's agency's chimpanzee experiments. By this time, the new vaccines were being tested in many countries, but they warned that, Much controversy still exists regarding the safety and new syndromes. In Athens, Fauci's scientists did an about face, Announcing that the new immunodeficiency syndrome might be caused by.

00:21:29 Speaker 9

Viral agents that might have co- infected the donors of plasma from which the vaccine hepatitis B surface antigen was isolated.

00:21:36 Speaker 7

They urged vaccine makers to find alternative sources that didn't use blood. Hillerman confirmed the emergence in recipients of factor eight. Highlighted the importance of adding pepsin and urea to provide further means to guarantee removal of viral material. Fauci would later confirm that chimpanzees are the source of HIV, yet the virus does not readily cause disease in its natural host. Like monkeys, asymptomatic chimpanzees also harbored a deadly virus. Yet, the vaccine was built on the assumption that was impossible due to their conviction that chimpanzees had.

00:22:14 Speaker 7

Identical immune systems. This nineteen eighty symposium goes to the heart of today's vaccine safety debate because they still refuse to admit what is right here in black and white. The foundational premise of this vaccine's safety was fatally flawed. Warning signs were already being ignored within months of starting the nineteen seventy eight trial on gay men. The New York trial scientists reported a flare up in participants who had received the vaccine. But rarely the placebo, And said he feared being branded a murderer and jailed, if whatever the vaccine transmitted proved to be serious. Now, we know a flare - up is the sign of initial HIV infection that goes away during a ten-year asymptomatic incubation period. But since the flare-up went away and the men seemed fine, they laughed it off. The CDC trials continued in California, the way Offit describes it.

00:23:11 Speaker 7

Five months into that California trial, Merck's Hillerman found out that the three chemical process with formaldehyde, Pepsin and urea to kill any known virus had been slightly changed in hopes of increasing production. Merck's patent filings revealed the change. Five years earlier, The three chemical process was detailed in this patent filed in May nineteen seventy five. Indeed, one month later. Someone else at Merck filed another patent, detailing the improved process for faster and more economical processing, using only formaldehyde without pepsin and urea.

00:23:12 Speaker 1

It was not a slight change, rather it eliminated two of the three chemicals to kill viruses, And the CDC later confirmed the Russian scientists' warning that formaldehyde by itself does not reliably inactivate HIV. Offit's claim that Hillerman found out about the change before the nineteen eighty meeting is demonstrably false. Six years before the meeting when the two patents were filed. It was Hillerman himself who announced that mass production was underway, expressly disclosing that the viral inactivation used the more economical formaldehyde-only method. Hillerman personally made one special lot, number five hundred fifty nine, which he called a prototype and tested on himself and staff. He reported clinical testing had been confined to this lot handmade in his lab. However.

00:24:07 Speaker 1

The trials on gay men used lot seven five one, One of the many commercial lots mass produced between nineteen seventy four and the nineteen eighty meeting. It had already been introduced in Africa under the brand name H B Vax. Following the nineteen eighty meeting, Hillerman revised his stance admitting:. The pepsin and urea steps in our process are judged to be critically important since they are highly destructive of viral infectivity. And provide a backup failsafe system for the formaldehyde. Remember, six years earlier he announced mass production had begun using formaldehyde alone, And by nineteen seventy eight, he'd already made eleven commercial lots, even before the trials on gay men began. But when announcing F D A approval, Hillerman revealed those original vaccines wouldn't be sold in the U S after all. Americans would have to wait for the newly launched production run.

00:25:03 Speaker 1

Which added rigorous sixty five week purification with pepsin and urea. He lamented that this drove the price of the new Hepavax B to one hundred dollars, nearly four hundred dollars today, making the vaccine too expensive for large scale use anywhere. It was soon irrelevant in rich countries because just one year after becoming available, Hillerman successfully trialed the modern recombinant version. It was the first vaccine made from viral antigens grown in a lab rather than harvested from infected hosts. Within a couple years, wealthy nations had replaced blood-derived vaccines with the blood-free alternative, eliminating the risk of viral transmission. But it remained expensive for the developing world. When the trials on gay men began, Hillerman expected that original formaldehyde-only version would sell for the usual price.

00:26:00 Speaker 1

Around one dollar per dose. So, What would they do with the millions of doses made between nineteen seventy, four and nineteen eighty before the backup failsafe with pepsin and urea made the vaccine too expensive for mass production? As Doctor Fauci explained in nineteen eighty seven, Everyone was still operating under the mistaken assumption that H I V killed within two years, not ten years. Therefore, Because, the men vaccinated in the clinical trials were still healthy so many years later, it would have seemed obvious the original formaldehyde- only inactivation had been sufficient after all. The CDC's Doctor Ryder explained what happened to those doses.

00:26:47 Speaker 2

Those plasma- derived vaccines were becoming, uh, HIV was just coming in. Uh, you couldn't use them anymore. But so Merck had made, Mill ions of doses of hepatitis B virus plasma derived vaccine, which they were going to throw away. It turns out that in Africa, in West Africa, the most common cause of cancer in adult men is liver cancer. The idea that we would use this vaccine not to prevent hepatitis but to prevent liver cancer.

00:27:16 Speaker 1

The CDC's Doctor Donald Francis tested the FDA licensed vaccine used in the US, Which included pepsin and urea. He confidently assured Americans: Inactivation of the AIDS virus during routine vaccine manufacture. Vaccination with the currently available hepatitis B vaccine poses no demonstrable risk for acquiring AIDS. But watch Doctor Francis's eyes as he talks about inactivation in the pre nineteen eighty version from his trial. Where.

00:27:48 Speaker 3

You take a group at risk of the disease, in this case hepatitis B, And some of them get vaccine and some of them get placebo. It was all gay men. This was the old plasma derived vaccine taken off of carriers of hepatitis B virus, human carriers, and then inactivated. And then inactivated. During the trial,

00:28:11 Speaker 1

Doctor Francis confirmed that original version indeed used formalin inactivation without pepsin and urea. In parallel with his CDC trial on gay men, The FDA also trialed it in Zambia, southern Africa, targeting stable monogamous family groups. Opposite demographics. Same outcome. Just as in the US, blood samples were archived in Zambia in advance of the vaccine rollout. Eight years later, when the FDA scientists tested them and discovered those Zambian communities had been entirely HIV negative when their trial began.

00:28:50 Speaker 1

They questioned if HIV even originated in Africa after all. In fact, all of the tens of thousands of samples collected in West, East and Southern Africa pre-vaccine were entirely HIV negative. The first HIV positive blood samples in Southern Africa were collected during those FDA trials near the Malawi border, half from Zambians who had just crossed, placing them near these remote villages during the trials. Over one thousand kilometers from any chimpanzees or known HIV reservoirs, These trial sites are the last place. One would have expected the virus to emerge, let alone divergent recombinant and mosaic HIV one strains, including the new and deadly subtype C that would soon decimate southern Africa. Pre vaccine HIV existed exclusively in central Africa around Cameroon and the Congo.

00:29:45 Speaker 1

The virus had circulated there for decades at very low levels, and the rate of infection had remained steady for some time, with about ten percent of Congo sex workers infected, and far less than one percent of the general population. Contrary to the mainstream narrative, Africa's first major outbreak was not in the Congo, then Zaire despite decades of circulation. Rather it was in Zambia. Although, all of the Zambian communities tested were free of HIV in 198 1 when the trial began, incredibly by 1983 Zambia's hospitals were filling up with AIDS cases. In the span of a couple years, Zambia's infection rates far surpassed the Congo's despite the decades long head start. Not only did this defy expected incubation periods, Zambia's cases were not concentrated in sex workers or high risk populations as in the Congo.

00:30:42 Speaker 1

To the contrary, the hardest hit were blood donors and medical staff. Higher education emerged as an unexpected predictor of infection. The leftover stockpile of the original, more economical HBVax continued to be rolled out across sub-Saharan Africa, India, Thailand and Southeast Asia. Alongside Merck HBVax, poor countries also got NYBCB Vax. The one made by Alfred Prince that alarmed French scientists for residual viral proteins. In the Lancet, scientists asked if this was just an unfortunate coincidence, noting:

00:31:22 Speaker 4

Despite reassurances from the CDC, Many fear that the AIDS agent could be included in the vaccine and be spread by it.

00:31:31 Speaker 1

Many commented on the conspicuous correlation that in nineteen seventy seven, the plasma harvesting began, followed by the trials. Primarily among the US gay communities in New York, San Francisco, and Los Angeles. Symptoms appeared in the donors within months in nineteen seventy eight. And when AIDS was recognized, The lion's share of global cases were in the US gay communities of those same three cities. While those are sexually active communities, One must ask why we observed the same correlation among the heterosexual communities in which the virus had long spread at very low levels.

00:32:10 Speaker 1

This is even more pronounced in African countries further south. In nineteen eighty five, when an H I V test became available, Barry Shoub from the W H O tested various demographics in multiple southern African countries and reported all were free of H I V,

00:32:27 Speaker 5

Except the only positive subjects were in the group comprising male homosexuals. The majority of these positive subjects had either recently been to the United States. Or had had sexual contact with other homosexuals who had visited the United States.

00:32:43 Speaker 1

Just a few years later, AIDS was devastating South Africa. For the first five years, AIDS in South Africa was limited to gay men, spreading at expected rates without a single case among black heterosexuals. But starting in nineteen eighty seven, it ravaged black heterosexuals with unprecedented velocity while white heterosexuals continued largely unscathed. If behaviour was responsible, the epicentre should have been South Africa's autonomous black territories. These bantustans were poor and entirely black. Instead, these fully independent reservations, largely isolated from modern medicine, were the safest places. Venda possessed the lowest HIV rate in continental sub-Saharan Africa, lower even than the wealthiest white zones.

00:33:35 Speaker 1

Across the border in Zimbabwe, almost half of new mothers were infected. In Venda, it was one in two hundred. By the nineteen nineties, Venda should have been out of the woods. Through successful safe sex campaigns, STD rates were at their lowest levels. But in the rest of South Africa, HIV infections were soaring even as other STDs like syphilis were plummeting. Then Shub came to Venda and it happened in Venda too. South African magazines already contained ads for modern blood-free vaccines. But, in these black communities, Shube reported that the highly motivated apartheid regime offered enthusiastic support to administer the nineteen seventies H B Vax that Merck was going to throw away. Venda's infection rate immediately exploded from one in two hundred to one in six, surpassing even Zimbabwe.

00:34:32 Speaker 1

Fast forward to two thousand and two, Shuub releases this W H O bulletin detailing his plan for universal immunization in Africa. By this point, the W H O relied heavily on funding from Bill Gates. The modern blood free vaccines used in developed countries for decades now cost only fifty five cents. However, to reduce the cost to a mere thirty seven cents The W H O was still using a plasma derived vaccine in Africa. The W H O's citation reveals it was still made using the same procedure described by Prince way back in nineteen eighty four, when HIV was first discovered. For important context, Prince's biography and autobiography describe a bitter rivalry that began when Merck's Maurice Hillerman refused to hire Prince at Merck. Prince depicts it as a clash of values.

00:35:28 Speaker 1

Describing Hilleman as the corporate titan making profitable vaccines for the rich. They paint Prince as the selfless philanthropist, who wanted to offer low cost vaccines for the poor. Prince's nineteen eighty four presentation, cited by the W H O twenty years later explains. There, Prince presented his original lots made from chimpanzee plasma. He cited this paper explaining that it was impossible to separate viral proteins from From the chimpanzee hepatitis B surface antigens that provided the vaccine's protection, Prince warned the W H O that his final vaccine did still harbor cryptic serum proteins and that it entails the theoretical danger of transmitting viruses. However, Prince reported that eight million doses were administered without anyone developing AIDS. Remember, that was based on the assumption that had the vaccine transmitted H I V.

00:36:27 Speaker 1

The patient would have died within two years. Prince touted the obvious economies:, if countries in the developing world made it locally from human blood, That would allow.

00:36:38 Speaker 6

The cost of plasma- derived vaccines to become low enough to remain competitive or even to be less expensive than the newer blood- free vaccines.

00:36:48 Speaker 1

These books reveal how he devoted the rest of his life to producing the vaccine locally in developing countries. After a falling out with New York Blood Center colleagues resulted in his exclusion from the lab and chimpanzees. By the year two thousand, the world had abandoned plasma derived vaccines. But in nineteen ninety nine, the Bill Gates Foundation injected the project with a five million dollar grant. Prince tried to establish manufacturing in Thailand, But.

00:37:19 Speaker 6

At the last moment, someone got to the Thai government to say plasma vaccine was not safe.

00:37:25 Speaker 1

Undeterred, he pivoted to Burma, which is now Myanmar, the poorest country in the world. His biography states:

00:37:34 Speaker 6

One could not think of a more unlikely place for technology transfer. Burma's infrastructure was in a state of advanced decay, and they had trouble getting uncontaminated water in Rangoon, let alone doing high technology production.

00:37:50 Speaker 1

The irony is staggering. Prince was driven by a self described socialist bias, hoping to help a desperate country bypass greedy capitalist pharmaceutical companies. But Myanmar was controlled by a brutal military junta. Instead of vaccinating their own impoverished citizens, the junta sold the vaccine on the open market to bankroll their oppressive regime. The U N, which had twice condemned the junta for forced labor, actually funded the project too.

00:38:21 Speaker 6

Make it less than an unmitigated disaster.

00:38:24 Speaker 1

To slash costs, Myanmar harvested their citizens'blood for pennies and Prince piggybacked production of Myanmar's primitive rabies vaccine made from the ground- up brains of rabid sheep. The W H O ranked Myanmar's healthcare the worst on Earth, warning their vaccines actively transmitted the rabies virus. Prince's distributor C J Chiel oversaw production. Other hepatitis B vaccines that used this method of inactivating viruses had already been withdrawn because of problems. Chil resorted to misleading customers into thinking these were the modern blood- free vaccines.

00:39:04 Speaker 4

Chil Sugar has replied to this demand by producing a cheap vaccine. However, in order to arrive at the reduction in price, quality and safety have had to be traded. The vaccinee, And very often physicians are unaware of this, and someone presumed protected may in fact be at immediate risk.

00:39:25 Speaker 1

You heard Hilfman call this the most technically complex vaccine, which required a costly three chemical process to inactivate viruses. You heard Offit say that only Hilfman had the genius and resources to do it, And that Hilfman launched a legendary tirade when someone at Merck tried to economize on the process that drove the cost to one hundred dollars. Yet, Shub was able to get them from the world's most dysfunctional military hunter for a mere thirty seven cents because no Asian country would touch them. During Covid, Shub touted his success mandating these very hepatitis B vaccines on Africans as justification for mandating Covid vaccines, assuring us: Vaccines are extremely safe. They have to be because you know, vaccines are given to healthy people.

00:40:14 Speaker 1

So we make absolutely sure that they are completely safe, as safe as possible. Shoube cited a WHO report, claiming they administered the plasma - derived vaccine hundreds of millions of times with no transmission of HIV. However, in sharp contrast to their public assurances, an internal WHO report concluded that every year 1.8 million people were infected with HIV and hepatitis by contaminated syringes. They downplayed it to not jeopardize their immunization programs. In the end, they dismissed nearly all transmission as sexual. Shub ignored decades of urgent warnings from Doctor Patricia Volkov. Since the early nineteen nineties, she has been shouting into the void, warning the W H O that plasma harvesting is killing donors. We're told to make sure our chocolate is ethically sourced, but Shub.

00:41:11 Speaker 1

Made no mention of the source of the blood used to shave a few pennies off each dose. It didn't seem to matter that it came from a place where fathers are selling their kidney to feed their children. Shub did at least address the mountain of evidence in these research papers by David Gisselquist, John Potterat and Devon Brewer. They cite numerous studies showing that two thirds of HIV infections in Africa cannot be explained by sexual transmission. However This was summarily dismissed with this one page rebuttal from Fauci's Covid origins scientists. They claim that if AIDS in Africa were spreading through medical injections, Hepatitis C would also be spreading simultaneously, which it was not. They overlooked the fact that these vaccines utilized formaldehyde, a chemical proven to inactivate Hepatitis C but not H I V. Those widely used vaccines.

00:42:10 Speaker 1

Were never subjected to placebo, controlled trials and long term follow up with one exception Doctor Francis's C D C San Francisco trial on gay men for that trial alone. Scientists actually did perform the long term vaccinated versus unvaccinated comparison that skeptics demand since Africans got the very same lot, seven fifty one that Doctor Francis used in his trial. That comparison will definitively settle accusations that an out of touch global elite has been cluelessly harming the vulnerable people. They thought were being helped by their initiatives. Has the greatest loss of life been wrought, not bytyrants and their wars, but rather by naive compliance with World Health Organization mandates? We don't need to speculate. We just need an official answer.

00:43:02 Speaker 4

When the trial ended, Was the HIV rate significantly higher in the vaccine recipients than in the unvaccinated placebo recipients?

00:43:03 Speaker 1

When Kaposi's sarcoma first appeared in the gay community, Fauci blamed herpes, recreational drugs, gay bowel syndrome and an unusual lifestyle. However, skin cancer researcher Alan Cantwell proposed something far more disturbing. By bucking the mainstream narrative, Cantwell became the first scientist to publish a research paper, suggesting that the true cause may be a novel infectious agent. Although Cantwell ended up being the first scientist to figure that out, Offit dismissed him as a dermatologist with uninformed views, because Cantwell claimed the vaccine transmitted the virus during the trials on gay men. Offit insisted,

00:43:47 Speaker 2

Although HIV was likely present in the blood from which he had made early preparations of his vaccine, Hillemann's choice of pepsin, urea and formaldehyde had completely destroyed it.

00:43:58 Speaker 1

Of course, that ignores the key point we just reviewed from this same book. Pepsin and urea were added after the trials on gay men. Offit embraced a competing narrative in another book released at the same time. It blamed Canadian flight attendant Gaetan Dugas, labeling him patient zero. Offit claims that Dugas's legendary sexual escapades in gay bars and bathhouses Placed him at the center of this C D C chart proving Dugas infected the first forty A I D S cases. Dugas, however, blamed the use of gay men's blood to make the vaccine. The two thousand twenty two edition of Offit's book still blames Dugas, but Offit ignored that our current understanding of incubation periods actually vindicates Dugas. All those men, he supposedly infected developed A I D S within seven to fourteen months of exposure.

00:44:55 Speaker 1

Ten months being the average incubation period. Today, it's well established that when the virus is transmitted sexually, the average asymptomatic incubation period is ten years, not ten months. Sexual transmission was assumed because all but one were patrons of gay bathhouses. Granted, none of these men received the Merck vaccine in the trial, but their task force leader revealed that gay bathhouses, Were used to harvest the vaccine's source material.

00:45:29 Speaker 3

The homosexual community were extremely good donors. They thought they were very civic minded in donating blood, And it's one of they thought it was their duty to donate blood and to be good citizens. And so, In some cities, they made up as much as a third of the donors or donations in those cities such as San Francisco. In fact, There were blood drives in in some of the gay bathhouses because because they were such good donors and they could get lots of blood.

00:46:07 Speaker 1

Lab technicians described drawing blood in bathhouses.

00:46:11 Speaker 4

This was utterly wild because sometimes the men appeared with their towels on and sometimes not. There was one guy who turned on in the fantasy room and somehow wandered down the hall. He took one glazed look at us and said," Is this the medical fantasy room?" And in unison we shouted," No, no. This is reality."

00:46:31 Speaker 1

The FDA required those donors sign waivers, accepting the risks from being injected with blood cells from other donors. Chimpanzees were being used as donors for vaccines sold outside the US. The San Francisco scientist who identified a link between early AIDS cases and plasma donation. Admitted she didn't check if all of them were donors. Notably, nobody has ever identified an early AIDS case who was not a donor. The CDC study, which blamed Dugas found that promiscuity with over one thousand partners was the least predictive risk factor. Even though Dugas himself blamed vaccine production, The study evaluated the risk for everything that went on inside those bathhouses except the vaccine makers' plasma harvesting.

00:47:18 Speaker 1

In 1982, four years after the trials began, hundreds of gay men were dead. Doctor Stevens, The New York trial scientist, who had previously laughed off the flare - up in the gay men in their trial, said : None of the patients with Kaposi's sarcoma were participants in the hepatitis B vaccine trial. Therefore, We do not think that the epidemic is caused by or related to the vaccine. Doctor Stevens's denial relies on several glaring omissions. She never mentioned that her lab was harvesting plasma for the vaccine in gay bathhouses. She has only ever admitted in personal communications that the world's first known H I V positive gay man was one of her donors. Even then, She failed to disclose that he became infected ninety days after her colleague Prince described hyper immunizing donors.

00:48:13 Speaker 1

With their less purified in-house vaccine made from chimpanzee plasma. We'll come back to that after the confrontation. She didn't mention if, as in San Francisco, The lion's share of early AIDS cases were concentrated in their own vaccine development cohort from which they recruited donors. It's public record that every early AIDS case appeared exclusively in cities with such cohorts. Her denial is based entirely on the dangerous assumption that, If the Merck vaccine had transmitted whatever virus was killing, the blood donors used to make it, then Kaposi's sarcoma would have appeared in vaccine recipients within four years. Pay attention to the critical blind spot :. She did not consider the possibility that Merck's vaccine might transmit only minuscule amounts of the virus, and that this might result in a very long incubation period. When the first two trial participants did develop Kaposi's sarcoma the following year,

00:49:11 Speaker 1

And both had received the Merck vaccine. She dismissed vaccine transmission as extraordinarily unlikely. To defend this stance, Stevens started claiming that the trial vaccine included purification with pepsin and urea, Even though those costly sixty five week steps were added two years after the trial began. She also began retroactively referring to the trial vaccine as Heptavax B. Instead of H B Vax, Conflating, the more economical lots used in Africa and tested on gay men with the highly purified F D A licensed version that was not causing AIDS. Recall that she had teased her lead investigator Wolf Schmunis because in an interview, Schmunis said that if the flare ups in vaccinated gay men proved serious, he feared being branded a murderer and jailed. At this point.

00:50:08 Speaker 1

Schmunis had in fact been jailed in Brazil for deranged behavior, and died. While alive, Schmunis explicitly documented that the later trial on dialysis staff utilized a newer vaccine lot than the one given to gay men. However, after his death, Stevens listed him as the lead author of papers that revised the historical record by suddenly claiming the dialysis staff trial used the same lot, seven five one tested on gay men. Thus appearing to rule out any possibility of vaccine transmission. Stevens continued listing Shmuness as her co-author more than two years after his death. Finally, Stevens argued the vaccine was safe by pointing out that the AIDS rate was even higher in the men excluded from the trial, always ignoring that many were their donors. Stevens vehemently denied that AIDS was related to the Merck vaccine in nineteen eighty two.

00:51:05 Speaker 1

Eighty three, eighty five, and eighty six. The CDC similarly insisted the vaccine could not have transmitted the virus in nineteen eighty two, eighty three, eighty four, and eighty six. By this point, it was moot in rich countries as they used only blood free vaccines. And, in nineteen eighty seven when the CDC salvaged Merck's original plasma derived vaccines that were going to be thrown away due to HIV transmission concerns. The C D C assured those nations that the concerns have proven to be unfounded. However, by this point, Doctor Stevens could definitively verify. She was testing the archived blood samples from both her trial participants and their massive cohort of thirteen thousand New York gay men dating back to nineteen seventy four. The most astonishing finding was that even though they concluded H I V had been circulating in New York since the nineteen sixties.

00:52:04 Speaker 1

Every single man in her gay cohort was H I V negative until September sixth, nineteen seventy seven. On that day, One of their plasma donors became the first known H I V positive gay man. After years without a single infection, the moment they reported using their experimental vaccine to hyper immunize their donors, Five percent of their cohort became infected the first year and half within a few years. However Doctor Stevens claimed the blood tests exonerated the Merck trial vaccine because HIV rates were identical in her trial's vaccine and placebo arms. But she conspicuously withheld the comparison from the year the trial ended. Instead, she presented HIV rates from five years after the trial. She included a mere nineteen percent of her trial participants because she only included men who never manifested symptoms, thus focusing on recent infections post-trial.

00:53:04 Speaker 1

They are not only irrelevant but also misleading because the unvaccinated placebo recipients were more likely to contract hepatitis. When they did, they were recruited as plasma donors. The C D C could have easily validated Doctor Stevens's report because they too were sitting on their own massive archive of San Francisco blood samples from cohorts that predated the vaccine trials, as Paul Offit confirmed in his book. The C D C only tested their samples in response to Cantwell's book claiming these irregularities in Doctor Stephen's papers were part of a cover up. So after nearly a decade of denials, The C D C finally agreed to conduct the definitive test to settle the matter using the archived blood samples from nearly all the San Francisco trial participants because these samples were collected before, during and after the trial.

00:53:59 Speaker 1

Researchers could finally determine exactly when each man contracted H I V, and crucially whether he had received the vaccine or the placebo. Their study revealed the magnitude of their miscalculation of the incubation period, the single foundational premise that had ruled out vaccine transmission all those years. Ten years earlier, one participant became infected in nineteen seventy eight during the pre trial screening. A couple more in nineteen seventy nine. But during the trial's active vaccination period between nineteen eighty and nineteen eighty two, forty two point four percent became infected. In nineteen eighty three, after vaccination ended, the rate of new infections quote dropped significantly and has remained low. But they didn't die within a couple years. In fact, only two even manifested symptoms a couple years after the trial. Remember.

00:54:56 Speaker 1

They had already administered the leftover stockpile in Africa millions of times, Based on the belief that none of the participants had contracted H I V during the trial. When in fact, nearly half of participants did. Yet incredibly, almost ten years later, seventy percent of them still remained asymptomatic. While the plasma donors were dying by nineteen seventy nine And the general gay population typically manifested symptoms within a decade. The incubation period for the trial participants was inexplicably quite different. All the assumptions they used to defend the vaccine had been completely wrong. The obvious explanation is Doctor Stevens's blind spot : plasma donors subjected to the process up to one hundred fifty times in eighteen months, died of AIDS within two years due to constant exposure to high viral loads.

00:55:52 Speaker 1

However, only minute traces of H I V had survived Merck's original formaldehyde-only process, resulting in the extraordinarily long incubation period in trial participants. They had the data right at their fingertips to confirm this. The trial's placebo arm wasn't just a control group for the vaccine ;. It was the ultimate baseline for the worst - case scenario of sexual spread. These unvaccinated men contracted hepatitis at one of the highest rates ever recorded, Proving they were engaging in extreme amounts of unprotected sex with multiple partners, while HIV was tearing through their community. If the HIV infection rate in this highly promiscuous placebo group had also been forty two percent, it would have irrefutably proven that the explosive spread of HIV was purely sexual.

00:56:43 Speaker 1

It would have exonerated both the vaccine and the plasma harvesters. Health officials surely would have touted that high placebo infection rate as hard proof that Africa dodged a bullet, And that no harm resulted from their catastrophic misunderstanding of the incubation period or Doctor Stevens's misleading papers. But imagine what it would have meant to report a significantly lower rate of H I V in that placebo arm virologically. Their own research determined that hepatitis is fifty times more transmissible through sex than HIV. Yet, During the trial on gay men and in the subsequent catastrophic outbreaks across sub- S ahar, an Africa and Southeast Asia, HIV was somehow spreading faster than hepatitis. Up to this point, The global health establishment simply assumed that HIV was inexplicably, defying the known laws of virology and magically becoming highly transmissible sexually.

00:57:40 Speaker 1

A low HIV rate in the placebo control arm, a group representing the absolute peak of high-risk sexual behavior, would shatter that assumption. It would prove not only that the vaccine and plasma harvesting both transmitted the virus, But that these extraordinary explosive global outbreaks were unlikely to be driven primarily by sexual behavior. Ultimately, such a revelation would shift the spotlight of blame away from the victims. And place it squarely on the global health community. It would vindicate the conspiracy theorists and validate anti - vax ers ' claim that the lack of long-term placebo - controlled trials is obfuscating vaccine safety signals. It would mean their groupthink, blind trust, And anything, but the vaccine blinders resulted in well -, meaning doctors condemning their patients to slow, agonizing deaths.

00:58:34 Speaker 1

Yet hiding such results would cause a clueless W H O to continue spreading H I V in Africa, and result in philanthropists slaughtering the vulnerable populations they aimed to help. So, if the H I V rate in the placebo arm had been significantly less, Health officials would have to choose between A release the breakdown, thus confessing that they were responsible for the A I D S pandemic. And that the lies to cover it up had spread the disease globally, or B withhold the breakdown, thus sacrificing the African continent to protect their reputations and the vaccine industry. Incredibly, nobody asked why they redacted the breakdown. As mentioned in the introduction, Doctor Offit claimed this very CDC study ruled out vaccine transmission. He wrote.

00:59:26 Speaker 2

Research ers tested Cantwell's hypothesis by examining the incidence of AIDS in men who had or hadn't received Hiliman's hepatitis B vaccine. There was no difference.

00:59:36 Speaker 1

Read his words carefully: By conspicuously avoiding the use of the word placebo, the men who hadn't received Hiliman's hepatitis B vaccine could have received Alfred Prince's, His ambiguous wording leads the public to believe a vaccine versus placebo comparison ruled out HIV transmission, While leaving open the possibility that he was comparing these two widely used vaccines against each other, and that both transmitted HIV. Note that just like Doctor Stevens, The CDC pivoted to a comparison against the study cohort, which suffered even higher infection rates. This gives the illusion.

01:00:18 Speaker 1

A vaccinated versus unvaccinated comparison found lower HIV rates among the vaccinated. We'll explore after the confrontation why that cohort was also vaccinated, making this a vaccine versus vaccine comparison. A, yes, to the keystone question would prove that the global health leaders demanding the power to control our behavior were faced with this difficult choice, and they chose option B.

01:00:50 Speaker 5

I am speaking directly to you, Susan Bookbinder, Paul Offit, Michael Worobey, Harold Jaffe, Beryl Koblin, George Lemp, George Rutherford Don Francis Nancy Hessell and Steven Hadler. I have reached out to all of you. Several of you were copied on emails where scientists within your own ranks admit the massive explosion of HIV during the trial's active vaccination window was overwhelmingly concentrated in the men, given the vaccine, not the placebo.

01:01:21 Speaker 5

Some admit the vaccine might have transmitted the virus. Now most of you dismissed those quote, unusual patterns as quote anomalies, because scientists unanimously agreed that the vaccine was safe. But, that's because you withheld this breakdown and audaciously claimed this data definitively ruled out vaccine transmission. The scientific community is operating under the false assumption that meant that HIV spread at similar rates in your trial's, placebo control arm. Let them know the truth. Only then can they evaluate my claims based on the actual facts. I have your emails proving that you ruled out vaccine transmission by comparing against plasma donors, not your placebo control arm. When I pointed this out, You threatened to pursue me for quote breach of confidentiality if I disclosed your internal communications. Some donors were hyperimmunized, likely with Alfred Prince's chimpanzee plasma derived vaccine.

01:02:18 Speaker 5

That is why Paul Offit resorted to ambiguous wording. The bar for today's vaccine was set very low because that disastrous original vaccine was the placebo in the clinical trial. The Henry Ford Institute study corroborated this, Noting that today, autoimmune disorders and neurological problems are six times higher in vaccinated children. The medical establishment discounts that conclusion based on the false assumption That your definitive CDC study contradicted rather than validated those findings. By withholding the data, You are denying the global health community, the facts required to make an informed decision. If Henry Ford's findings are ultimately recognized, then every single day you continue to hide the answer, the permanent injuries of another one hundred thousand children are on your hands.

01:03:12 Speaker 5

You also released this later study, showing that among the most promiscuous men in your placebo control arm, specifically those who naturally contracted hepatitis, only nine percent had contracted HIV as of six years post trial. Logically during the trial that rate had to be significantly lower. Therefore, it is a matter of public record that the rate of HIV was obviously much lower in your placebo control arm. That proves that even the worst case rate of sexual spread is far less than scientists thought. Something else was the primary driver. Yet, despite this clear evidence that everything the scientific community thought they knew about AIDS was completely wrong, The CDC deputy director's written response to my FOIA alleges that nobody asked any questions after seeing dose dependent HIV rates. Everyone just kept administering the vaccine, dismissing the spread as sexual.

01:04:08 Speaker 5

This data is needed to reveal what happens when credentialism, groupthink and an 'anything but the vaccine' dogma supersede common sense. The Henry Ford Institute funded their own study, Owned their data and was arguably within their legal rights to withhold it to protect their pharmaceutical funding. However, your study was funded by taxpayers. They surrender their hard-earned wages based on a fundamental social contract. They are the lawful owners of the data, and it will be used to benefit them, not weaponized to trick them into compliance. Your justification appears to be a paternalistic belief that the public cannot handle the truth and will stop complying. You are right. I would have never complied with the Covid mandate had this data been released, and I'd still be healthy. And I doubt Bill Gates would have funded the WHO's initiative to similarly force Africans to roll up their sleeves.

01:05:06 Speaker 5

Part three of this series will pivot to the harm coming from the other side of Lake Geneva. I aim to show that just as Africa was harmed by World Health Organization initiatives, Latin America has also been harmed by World Economic Forum initiatives, mainly digital ID, electronic invoicing and central bank payments. However, that is more nuanced. To get them to consider it with an open mind, I need this answer on the record. To show how oblivious they've been to unintended consequences. Think carefully about your next steps because AI threatens to render you obsolete. Your institutions are quickly discovering that preferred narratives can be reinforced much more efficiently with silicon than with carbon. Why rely on you when GPUs can generate models to support any narrative, free of dissent, conscience or uncomfortable questions?

01:06:01 Speaker 5

To remain relevant, you, the scientific community, must step up and reclaim your core mission. Embody Galileo's courage. Challenge orthodoxy rather than rubber stamping it. Prove that A I is no substitute for a morally guided human mind. You have nothing to gain by stonewalling and everything to lose, if you do not get ahead of this. So here is my offer: If just one among your ranks finds the courage to officially disclose the breakdown and explain the decision to withhold it for part two of this series, I will gladly replace this confrontation with the data and a message that an official explanation is coming. Everyone else will be left out of this, and I will work with that person, Confirming that I too hesitated to approach Doctor Stevens because Alan Cantwell's valid claims about her vaccine lot switcheroo.

01:06:55 Speaker 5

Were woven into wild accusations of a genocidal plot. When I approached her, I was sent supposedly leaked intelligence reports proving her evil role. The bizarre conspiracy theories made the entire topic radioactive, Acting as a massive smokescreen that tricked investigators into discrediting themselves and repelled mainstream scientists.

01:06:56 Speaker 1

Look, spin control is better than damage control. You can explain the genuine confusion caused by the belief that dialysis staff received the exact same vaccine lot as gay men. But if you respond with no comment, history will record that deafening silence as no contest. If you lie, feign ignorance or try to silence me, Then people will know not only the answer is yes, but many will conclude your deception is willful. Your opportunity to get ahead of this will have passed. And I will have no choice but to escalate. Instead of collaboration, Part Two will detail how one of your co-authors was named in South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation hearings and genocide trial for their involvement in Project Coast, the apartheid regime's bioweapons program to eradicate the black population. This will include an on- camera confession of intentional administration of HIV - transmitting vaccines in black communities.

01:07:54 Speaker 1

Let's not go there. All I want is the truth, so we can learn from history and stop repeating the same mistakes. To everyone watching, the time to settle this is running out. On all major platforms, this topic is already censored as misinformation. Right now, we can only discuss this on free speech platforms like X and Telegram. But this year's age verification laws will soon require us to obtain government clearance to access them. And, we have already been put on notice that this will be used to suppress undesired narratives. So soon, we may not be able to touch this topic at all. But, if we can force the release of this data before those laws take effect, We may expose the danger of allowing the perpetrators of this tragedy to control the narrative. Please consider supporting this effort. Your tax deductible donation will fund a proper documentary producer for part two, giving it the professional production values necessary.

01:08:51 Speaker 1

To encourage respected scientists to participate, I promise full transparency and that everything will be released into the public domain. The second half of part one will now dismantle the CDC scientist's counterarguments and end by showing that it takes a mere sixty seconds to prove irrefutably that the entire global scientific community is lying about this topic.

01:09:19 Speaker 2

The C D C set aside the definitive vaccine versus placebo comparison, based on the same argument Doctor Stevens used in New York. H I V emerged first and with greater velocity in the cohorts from which the trial participants were recruited. Remember these cohorts were established in New York and San Francisco to archive gay men's blood samples at regular intervals after testing for hepatitis. Those uninfected were recruited for the vaccine trial, and the blood of those with prior infection was harvested for pharmaceutical production. Even though HIV had long been circulating in New York, causing 'junkie pneumonia' since at least nineteen seventy three, none of the cohort participants became infected until late nineteen seventy seven. Simultaneously on both the east and west coasts, HIV entered those cohorts.

01:10:14 Speaker 2

And within one year, five percent of both cohorts were infected. And in just a couple years, nearly half had contracted the virus. But this explosive spread wasn't reflective of the cities as a whole. Far from it. Remember that in San Francisco, this cohort represented only about five percent of the gay community, yet sixty percent of early AIDS cases. This chart shows how over just three years As the virus radiated outward from the cohort and spread to the greater metropolitan area, that extreme concentration quickly dissipated, dropping to fourteen percent. These cohorts were ground zero where, after nearly a decade of slow spread in New York, H I V hit these cities like a bomb in late nineteen seventy seven, with identical explosions three thousand miles apart. Fortunately, at the precise moment and location of impact.

01:11:10 Speaker 2

This photograph was taken, revealing what the men were doing when they became infected. Rather than investigating the role of this intervention, the CDC used these men as a substitute for their placebo control arm. HIV was spreading even faster among these donors than among the vaccine trial participants. The CDC is arguing that ruled out any possibility that even a trace amount of the virus killing these donors had survived the vaccine's inactivation process.

01:11:40 Speaker 2

They are effectively claiming that somehow superseded a vaccine versus placebo comparison, and justified the continued rollout in poor countries of the leftover stockpile. The newspaper described the massive plasma harvesting campaign as steady but boring work. These were the plasmapheresis centers that Doctor Dritz would later identify as the common link among early AIDS cases, in Pune India. Hiv prevalence among donors was zero percent when one of these centers opened and seventy eight percent seven months later. Pune sits on the main highway to Mumbai, so it's safe to assume that many donors were truck drivers. Yet in India, The WHO listed driving a truck, not donating plasma as a key driver of India's explosive AIDS outbreak. Similarly in the US.

01:12:36 Speaker 2

The possibility of H I V infection during this process has never been considered. A donor's blood was drained into a bag, the plasma was separated out, and the remaining red blood cells were re-injected back into the donor. This allowed the men to be harvested twice a week for seven dollars a pint. Every year this harvester sent twenty thousand liters of plasma to Cutter Laboratories for processing. This was a couple blocks from the San Francisco City Clinic cohort. Right after it had been formed to develop the vaccine in collaboration with Alfred Prince in New York. This operation was overseen by Doctor Girish Vyas, head of the U C San Francisco Blood Bank, Who at this time was also collaborating with Alfred Prince, but on a different related product. Doctor Vyas and Prince had recently completed trials of hepatitis B immune globulin or H B I G.

01:13:33 Speaker 2

The F D A had just approved it, Resulting in a significant change in the way the plasma was collected from those men. Before nineteen seventy seven, to most blood banks, anyone with a history of hepatitis is about as welcome as Typhoid Mary. But that changed when the F D A approved H B I G in nineteen seventy seven. The exact moment the bomb hit the cohorts. Understand. A vaccine injects viral material to teach your body to build its own immunity. The F D A approved the first hepatitis B vaccine in nineteen eighty one. However, four years earlier, the F D A approved H B I G, which does the opposite. It is a temporary shield made by harvesting infection, fighting antibodies from the plasma of already infected donors. Cutter Laboratories, one of the largest operations, is run by Griffols today.

01:14:30 Speaker 2

The most critical detail is that even now, H B I G is manufactured by repeatedly vaccinating donors to keep antibody levels high during plasma collection. Yet, when the F D A approved H B I G in nineteen seventy seven, a commercial hepatitis B vaccine was still several years away. So, how did Cutter get enough antibodies from these men to make H B I G? Cutter simply made their own experimental vaccine.

01:15:01 Speaker 2

Offit wrote a book about how Cutter made a polio vaccine, so recklessly that it transmitted live poliovirus to hundreds of thousands of children. Offit blamed Cutter for vaccine hesitancy, calling their monkey-based polio vaccine one of the worst biological disasters in American history. He assured us that Cutter Laboratories never again made another polio vaccine. What he failed to mention Is that Cutter used chimpanzees to make a hepatitis B vaccine in nineteen, seventy seven at their lab in Berkeley, a San Francisco suburb, when they needed a vaccine to hyper immunize gay men? If Prince's chimpanzee plasma treatments introduced H I V in New York when they began in the nineteen sixties, Then the virus should have become diversified in New York by the time H B I G was approved in nineteen seventy seven. That year.

01:15:53 Speaker 2

Doctor Vyas would have detonated the bomb in San Francisco. He would have introduced en masse a single strain while hyper immunizing plasma donors to make H B I G. That would leave an irrefutable viral fingerprint, specifically a starburst shaped phylogeny or founder effect. San Francisco scientists confirmed that is precisely what they observed. Fauci's lead COVID origin scientist agreed the genetic diversity, proved the virus spread in New York. Then there was a massive introduction of a single strain in San Francisco, like Cutter after Merck patented the costly process with pepsin and urea, followed by the more economical process without. Merck similarly patented a third special version of their vaccine to administer exclusively to plasma donors for HBIG production. Crucially.

01:16:47 Speaker 2

Purification was not critical since donors came from marginalized populations already infected with hepatitis anyway. Donors were vaccinated six times, followed by repeated boosters to keep antibody levels high. Merck identified this vaccine given to donors as the starting material, To which the rigorous three chemical purification was added to kill any known virus before it reached the general public. Since Offit and Fauci admit the blood Merck used as source material was quote, heavily contaminated with H I V, One would logically expect gay men in San Francisco who donated plasma to contract H I V that same year. Remember, Doctor Dritz pointed out that's precisely what happened. However, Doctors Vyas and Prince could have improved yield with Prince's own vaccine. Recall that same year Prince detailed his simple techniques.

01:17:44 Speaker 2

So that poor countries could make N Y B C B vax locally, Prince admitted it was highly controversial because he intentionally left viral material intact from the chimpanzee blood, both to slash the cost of purification and to stimulate greater production of antibodies. Those antibodies are the very ingredient they began harvesting from gay men to make H I G. Precisely when and where HIV began spreading with explosive velocity among those donors. Here is a microscopic image of the chimpanzee viral material left in the final vaccine, which the CDC effectively used as a substitute for placebo in their control arm. In his patent, Prince explains that he used the pooled plasma of chimpanzees that had been injected with infected human plasma. Although human blood could be used.

01:18:37 Speaker 2

Chimpanzee blood, he noted, Offered a practical advantage because he could subject the apes to a specific protocol to induce chronic hepatitis infections. The exact method he used to induce that massive viral production is another overlooked and extremely critical point that we will cover shortly. The use of N Y B C B V A X to hyper immunize plasma donors is not speculative. On May sixteenth, 1977, Prince wrote that it would.

01:19:09 Speaker 3

Permit rapid expansion in present supplies of HBIG by stimulation of plasmapheresis donors.

01:19:17 Speaker 2

Remember, Prince's colleague, Stevens admitted that the first known HIV- positive gay man was one of their donors, Part of the New York cohort whose blood had become infected during a September sixth harvesting, barely 90 days later. The way Stevens and the C D C set aside their trials placebo control arms, and instead compared against the cohorts who were also vaccinated, perfectly demonstrates Dell Bigtree's whiskey study analogy. Whiskey makers prove their product does not cause car accidents by comparing it against a placebo control group, while hiding the fact that the placebo was actually vodka. Prince also collaborated with a center in Los Angeles.

01:20:01 Speaker 2

That similarly vaccinated their plasma donors. Although the cohorts were entirely HIV negative when HBIG production began, Within one year of using these vaccines to manufacture it by continuously hyper immunizing plasma donors in New York City, San Francisco and Los Angeles.

01:20:19 Speaker 3

Aids appeared suddenly and almost simultaneously in several metropolitan areas of the United S tates: homosexual men living in New York City, San Francisco and Los Angeles.

01:20:35 Speaker 1

I have immense respect for the exhaustive research in the origin of AIDS by Canadian doctor Jacques Pepin. Doctor Pepin is widely credited with cementing the mainstream narrative, but he acknowledges when that requires leaps of faith. He repeatedly expresses frustration that his US counterparts refused to acknowledge the obvious spread of HIV during plasma harvesting. He is clearly unaware they had to pretend plasma donation posed no risk, Because, they were using those donors as a substitute for their trial's placebo control arm to rule out vaccine transmission. He meticulously draws the dots, implicating those vaccines, but doesn't connect them, assuming American health officials were also acting in good faith.

01:21:20 Speaker 2

Start with Marilyn. Pepin confirms she was a chimpanzee imported to the US for these NASA experiments, likely born around nineteen fifty eight in Cameroon, the origin of H I V. She carries the oldest sequenced viral strain, which Pepan places in the middle of HIV's viral tree. Air Force scientists discovered that these chimpanzees were injected with pooled human blood upon capture and proposed that the chimps were simply transient carriers of human hepatitis virus already circulating in Cameroon. Pepan confirms HIV was also circulating in Cameroon at the time, therefore.

01:22:01 Speaker 2

In addition to the chimpanzees' ancestral strains, Some of these chimps could have been transient carriers co-infected with the contemporary HIV strains already circulating among humans in Cameroon. In the US, Marilyn was used in experiments between nineteen sixty six and nineteen sixty nine. However, Pepin fails to mention they were done by Prince who explained at the time.

01:22:26 Speaker 3

The use of chimpanzee plasma as an alternate source for H B I G is under consideration. Chimpanzee gamma globulin could represent a logical source for protective antibody for human use.

01:22:39 Speaker 2

Pepin reports that H I V entered the U S via New York in nineteen sixty nine, But he doesn't connect the dots to Prince's use of that H I V positive chimpanzee plasma for hepatitis control experiments in that same city in that same year. In addition to H B I G, Prince also extracted viral antigen from this chimp blood and in 1971 wrote,"

01:23:03 Speaker 3

D rug addicts should be an ideal source of antibody- containing plasma by hyperimmunization of donors with antigen preparations." Remember,

01:23:12 Speaker 2

Prince described doing the same thing to gay men in May 1977, three months before one of his donors became the first HIV- positive gay man. And his antigen preparations. Were branded NYBCB Vax and widely used across sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. It's the same formulation, the WHO continued sourcing at the factory that Prince set up in Myanmar following Bill Gates's funding. If this spread HIV in all those communities for four decades, then HIV infections would have occurred even earlier for drug addicts, specifically in New York in nineteen seventy one six years before gay men.

01:23:54 Speaker 2

In the first edition of his book, Peppen admitted that is precisely what happened, noting US drug addicts were infected even earlier than gay men. Initially, everyone including Doctor Fauci agreed infection logically aligned with symptom onset. New York drug users were the first dying of quote, junkie, pneumonia and giving birth to infected babies as early as nineteen seventy three. Gay men followed five years later.

01:24:24 Speaker 2

With Haitian refugees in Florida emerging as the third group. But Pépin's second edition erased that inconvenient chronology. He inverted the timeline, claiming infections happened in the exact opposite order of symptom onset. He proposes gay men on sex tourism holidays in Haiti brought the virus back and infected the drug users, Without explaining why drug users were dying of AIDS years before the first gay man showed a symptom. Before chimpanzees and drug users, Prince had another antigen source. Offit suggests Prince should have won a Nobel Prize for figuring out how to get the vaccine's antigens from patients after a transfusion. Prince's patients were aged three, five and nine at the Willowbrook State School. The transfusion was an intentional injection of blood containing live hepatitis.

01:25:19 Speaker 2

Scientists from Doctor Fauci's agency acknowledged Prince's volunteers died from the process, Leading to changing social mores that resulted in postponement of the vaccine's development until they came up with the chimpanzee model. That refers to a crusade by Robert F Kennedy Senior to halt the practice. In response, Stanley Plotkin, known as the godfather of vaccines Defended injecting those children with viruses to harvest vaccine source material. He argued they were not potential contributors to society, calling those children, most with Down syndrome, human in form but not in social potential. However, Because the F D A required the use of human blood for the U S market, The industry was forced to also seek out more human donors who would not trigger public outrage.

01:26:13 Speaker 2

One year after the New York and California cohorts targeted gay men, Florida identified another demographic that could be harvested without consequence: Haitian refugees, known as boat people. Florida became the third state to create a hepatitis B study cohort. Yet again, opposite demographics, identical outcomes. But then in the fall of nineteen eighty one, the mystery became even more ominous. When the disease was also diagnosed in otherwise healthy immigrants from Haiti, men who were neither homosexual nor drug users. The CDC referred to these first groups with AIDS as the three H's. Every early case among gay men was limited to New York and California, while every early Haitian case was found in Florida. In every community, every archived blood sample was HIV negative when the cohorts were established. In each case.

01:27:09 Speaker 2

Symptoms emerged in just twelve to twenty four months, bypassing the standard ten year asymptomatic window when transmission is sexual. This pattern repeated as the hepatitis studies expanded to Zambia, South Africa, India and Thailand. Remember Zambia's cohort also archived blood samples providing a definitive baseline when they began. All were H I V negative and two years later. Zambian hospitals were overflowing with AIDS cases. The plasma industry established harvesting operations alongside these cohorts, where health officials tested the community, serving as taxpayer-funded recruiters funneling the infected to the centers for collection. Nearly every page of the nation's leading gay magazines featured ads offering cash for plasma. They were harvesting both the donors' own antibodies to make HBIG.

01:28:05 Speaker 2

Which required continuous hyper immunization with the experimental vaccines and also the live viruses antigens to make the upcoming commercial vaccine. Most operations targeted gay men and ran alongside the New York and California cohorts. Gamma Dynamics set up shop alongside the Florida cohort in Pompano Beach, Florida, known as Little Haiti, The Beach where Haitian boats came ashore. Gamma Dynamics said they hoped to make a killing Selling the refugees' infected plasma to Merck. The CDC confirmed boat people had the highest rates of hepatitis. They were also the poorest demographic in the hemisphere. The CEO of the plasma processor, David Gurey, volunteered at the South Florida Haiti Project. Notably, The highest per capita rate of AIDS in the country was in the farming community of Belle Glade, just forty miles away.

01:29:01 Speaker 2

Where those Haitian refugees worked as manual laborers. Doctor Fauci argued Haitians were simply closeted homosexuals. Yet before nineteen eighty one, there was zero cases in the large Haitian enclave of New York, the epicenter of the outbreak in gay men, nor in the substantial Haitian communities of Canada and France. Every early Haitian case appeared exclusively among Florida refugees. The CDC's doctor Castro investigated. You were certainly involved in several higher profile, very visible investigations. One of which was situated in the city of Belle Glade in Florida.

01:29:42 Speaker 4

And, the investigators had described a number of cases of AIDS in the city of Belle Glade and claimed that the majority of them did not have risk factors and were speculating that maybe insects. Were transmitting HIV not unlike so many other arboviral infections. So, we ended up quickly ascertaining that the majority of the so- called no- identified- risk individuals had indeed other well- established risk factors.

01:30:17 Speaker 2

The other well- established risk factor in Doctor Castro's paper is simply having had heterosexual contact at any point with another Haitian. Even without any evidence that the partner was actually infected, The paper assumes AIDS was so rampant in Haitian communities that any heterosexual contact with a Haitian guaranteed infection. Yet, it ignores the obvious question. :. Why did this exclusively affect refugees who had recently arrived in Florida? Furthermore, half had been married, and only three had passed the virus to their spouses.

01:30:52 Speaker 2

Showing the inefficiency of heterosexual transmission even among Haitians. Also, none of the children were infected, which directly contradicts their assumption that HIV had long been circulating in Haiti. Blood tests confirmed American scientists tested all archived blood samples and more than eight hundred autopsy samples from unusual deaths in Haiti before the US outbreak.

01:30:53 Speaker 1

They concluded that AIDS did not exist in Haiti prior to the year. Those vaccinated Florida refugees would have returned following deportation. By the time of Castro's investigation, It was already established that HIV was present in the blood that Prince had used to make the vaccine given to donors. Castro's team did investigate possible transmission by mosquitoes, lice, mites, fleas, bedbugs, sunlight, insect repellent etc. Anything but the vaccine, which many AIDS patients blamed. Ironically, the CDC could see the FDA's blind spots with factor eight, yet not their own with vaccines.

01:31:35 Speaker 2

Entity in the F D A was heavily influenced by the blood banking members. And at that meeting I did refer to I think it's ostrich like behavior. It's like, I don't want to hear about those cases that you know.

01:31:50 Speaker 1

At the end of nineteen eighty two, Three months after AIDS was recognized, Gurry and other plasma harvesters were required to sign certifications that they had halted the process. But they only halted it in the United States. The operations simply relocated overseas. A leading blood expert later noted that AIDS outbreaks in developing countries correlated exactly with the arrival of those plasma facilities. While Doctor Pepper endorses the narrative that HIV migrated in the nineteen sixties from Africa to Haiti to New York's gay community, he admits the flaws. None of the Haitians who returned from Africa developed AIDS, And Haiti was a major supplier of blood plasma to make US pharmaceuticals in the early nineteen seventies. Reportedly, Not one of the six thousand Haitians who donated plasma before the US outbreak was infected.

01:32:43 Speaker 1

Factor eight was made from the pooled plasma of thousands of donors and would have transmitted the virus to hemophiliacs if any of the donors were infected. Yet that didn't happen until after plasma from US gay men became infected in nineteen seventy seven. Pepin speculates that perhaps Haitian plasma was used exclusively for other products, which were subjected to viral inactivation. Yet if factor eight wasn't being made from Haitian plasma Then, it would have had to be made from the other major plasma source at the time, gay men. If even zero point one percent of gay men had been infected in nineteen seventy six, The statistical probability of any given factor eight lot transmitting the virus would be around ninety percent. Since the thousands of pre nineteen seventy seven lots were entirely uncontaminated, the book's claim that New York gay men imported the virus from Haiti.

01:33:42 Speaker 1

Around nineteen seventy one appears mathematically impossible. Remember, H I V was definitely circulating among the New York drug addicts, Prince used as test subjects, but they were all hepatitis carriers. The nation's blood supply remained completely H I V free as long as they were as welcome as Typhoid Mary in blood banks. Once they were no longer excluded in nineteen seventy seven, A round ninety percent of hemophiliacs who received factor eight lots made from blood collected after that point died of AIDS. In nineteen eighty four, the year HIV was discovered and Fauci was appointed to lead the response, before even one case had been identified in Africa that predated the US outbreak, Fauci already laid out the narrative that would get funding.

01:34:33 Speaker 3

Let me tell you another fact: in the late sixties and early seventies, Thousands, not a few, but thousands of Haitians came to Zaire, particularly in Kinshasa, the capital, to work as technical advisers for the Zairian government. After several years there because of the nationalization of much of the industry, they were essentially kicked out of Zaire and came back to Haiti, to the United States and to Canada. Is that a possible connection? The answer is yes.

01:35:08 Speaker 3

Because, it is very likely that the male homosexuals in New York City, who frequently traveled to P ort- au- P, rin ce in Haiti for vacations and for sexual contacts down there, picked up the virus in Haiti.

01:35:22 Speaker 1

Fauci knew that was impossible when he said it. He had already reported that New York drug users were giving birth to infected babies before the nationalization program was even announced on November 30 th, 1973. Besides, His scientists reported that the surge in cases in Kinshasa had to be very recent, because the virus appeared almost entirely in babies less than twelve months old. Few children over one were infected. Further, exclusively in hospital settings, half of the infected children had uninfected mothers. The surge in Kinshasa correlated with the opening of a plasma harvesting center, not a sudden change in sexual behavior. However.

01:36:06 Speaker 1

When promoting his book, Doctor Pepon claimed evidence ultimately vindicated Fauci's narrative. We suggest that this exportation from Haiti to the US occurred through sexual tourism. Haiti's tourism - based economy collapsed when Fauci transformed their image from tropical paradise to Chernobyl of the Caribbean. However, Pepon concedes that all of the actual physical evidence, Supported Haitian scientists'claims that HIV circulated in the US before Haiti, And that Fauci's Haiti first model became established when.

01:36:41 Speaker 4

Molecular biologists came to the rescue of historians.

01:36:45 Speaker 1

He appears to refer to his co- author Andrew Rambo. In twenty twenty, Rambo received a private message, calling it so friggin likely that COVID nineteen originated from the Wuhan lab. Rambo replied, The truth is never going to come out. Given the shit show that would happen if anyone serious accused the Chinese of even accidental release, we are content with ascribing it to natural processes. One claim in Doctor Peppa's book is demonstrably false. He wrote:

01:37:16 Speaker 4

There is no documentary evidence that chimpanzee cells were ever used anywhere in the world to produce any vaccine targeting viral infections.

01:37:26 Speaker 1

Visit openlibrary dot org, enter this ID, And go to page ten. At that WHO symposium, in front of thousands, global health leaders reported their patients were quote immunized with chimpanzee cells. They also used chimpanzee blood to prime heart lung machines for patients of blood type. O, And surgically connected patients to tranquilized chimpanzees of the same blood type to use them as living dialysis machines. These appear to be genuine oversights because Doctor Pappin's book is refreshingly honest in highlighting the glaring holes in the mainstream narrative. Though he didn't realize that vaccine transmission perfectly fills them. He wrote,

01:38:10 Speaker 4

At least thirty million doses of such crude vaccines were administered before they were replaced by genetically engineered vaccines, which eliminated all risk of infection. The early hepatitis B vaccines were not incriminated in the transmission of HIV either. Presumably, the methods used to inactivate HBV were effective against HIV as well.

01:38:35 Speaker 1

Recall they were administered hundreds of millions of times, And Myanmar's crude vaccine was still in use thirty years after Merck added pepsin and urea to address concerns. Perhaps Doctor Pepin will revisit this conclusion once he hears the answer.

01:38:58 Speaker 1

The scientific community has never proposed an explanation for a baffling enigma. When an HIV blood test became available, it turned out many early cases weren't infected. Something else had wiped out their immune system. It was called HIV- negative AIDS.

01:39:16 Speaker 5

HIV was never present by any means in all cases of AIDS, but Anthony Fauci made sure that there was a perfect correlation, By eliminating about 5,000 HIV-negative AIDS cases. There was a conference in Amsterdam in the early 1990s, an AIDS conference. Doctors started to go to the podium in a session where they were talking about HIV -, negative AIDS, and they began to say, "Yeah, I have some too. A clinical AIDS patient has every symptom, but tests negative on every test, no matter how many times they test."

01:39:54 Speaker 5

And so there was a clamor. There was a sense of anxiety. Wait a minute, what is this? Could it be? Could it be that Peter Duesberg is right? And Anthony Fauci flew in on Air Force Two to that conference. And he did his thing, and he quashed it. He just quashed it. He gave a statement through Newsweek that this just wasn't an issue. It was a misunderstanding. And, what they did at that moment was they took all of the HIV negative AIDS cases, and they renamed them and threw them out of the official definition.

01:40:37 Speaker 6

In a brazen move to explain away the anomaly of AIDS without HIV, Dr. Fauci declared that the unexplained AIDS cases represented a new disease. To avoid suspicion that his quote" new disease" end quote, Was after all chronic fatigue syndrome. Dr. Fauci labeled his discovery idiopathic CD4+ lymphocytopenia, or ICL. In this tongue twister, idiopathic means of unknown source. I did not know other HIV/AIDS was.

01:41:19 Speaker 6

The thing that was was the force that killed all of these people in the 80s and 90 s. What we do know is that there was a deliberate, purposeful effort that was orchestrated by Tony Fauci, a crusade to silence dissidents, to make sure the debate didn't happen. Make sure that science that challenged the official orthodoxy was suppressed, that people who voiced that science had their careers destroyed, they were silenced, they were vilified, they were marginalized, they were ridiculed, they were made radioactive.

01:42:04 Speaker 1

A logical, albeit sinister explanation for HIV- negative AIDS emerges when you follow the money for the hepatitis B vaccine. It's here in the research papers from the F D A scientists who helped invent the vaccine's chimpanzee model with Fauci's scientists and run the vaccine trials in southern Africa. They also held five patents related to the vaccine and stood to get a cut of the sales. One problem kept them from cashing in, Even though the C D C reported that Haitian boat people had the highest rates of hepatitis by far, The Florida plasma harvester recruiting them.

01:42:41 Speaker 1

Reported that only fifteen out of every three thousand potential donors naturally produced usable quantities of the hepatitis B surface antigen. Remember, for this reason, Prince found chimpanzees offered the practical advantage because he could subject them to a protocol to induce chronic hepatitis infections. To make a killing, plasma harvesters needed to do it to human donors. The F D A scientists who held the patents and whose financial interests aligned explained the protocol. Immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide predisposed donors to chronic production of hepatitis B surface antigen. Even without H I V, cyclophosphamide leads to immune system collapse and Kaposi's sarcoma within just four months. The evidence of this practice is hiding in plain sight. Remember.

01:43:33 Speaker 1

All, but one of the forty early cases were patrons of bathhouses where plasma harvesters operated, and all of the men manifested symptoms within seven to fourteen months. And some yet unknown agent was causing the HIV negative AIDS that Fauci renamed I C L. Plasma harvesters had a strong and perverse financial incentive to surreptitiously inject donors with immunosuppressive drugs. So that their immune systems would stop fighting the hepatitis virus, that would allow the virus to establish permanent replication in the donors' livers, Thus creating a copious supply of the highly profitable viral antigens that harvesters hoped to make a killing selling to Merck. Harvesters referred to their donors as plasma cows. Yet legal proceedings established that purely for financial gain.

01:44:26 Speaker 1

These same FDA officials allowed Cutter and other plasma harvesters to sacrifice even upstanding citizens.

01:44:33 Speaker 7

Why is Bayer Corporation the Rat of the Week? Internal documents show that after this company positively, absolutely knew that they had a medication that was infected with the AIDS virus, They took the product off the market in the US, and then they dumped it in France, Europe, Asia and Latin America. The medicine's called Factor Eight. It was an inject an injection medicine. That was used for hemophiliacs, mostly children. Children had been born with an incurable. Hold on, Mike. So hold on, hold on. So, you are telling me that Bayer knew that this drug was infected with the AIDS virus? They yanked it from the market in America, and then they dumped it in markets overseas. They had to figure out a way, Joe, to make a profit on a product that they could not sell in America. So they made a huge profit. They jumped, they dropped the product in Japan, Spain and France. By the way, Joe government officials in France.

01:45:24 Speaker 7

That allowed that to happen actually had to go to prison for it in America. Not one corporate executive for this company has been indicted or even criminally investigated by our justice department. Why not? You're telling me that these people that dumped this AIDS tainted blood in foreign countries who killed children have not been have not been taken to task in the United States? It's worse than that. The US government allowed it to happen. The FDA allowed this to happen. And now the government is completely looking the other way. Thousands of innocent hemophiliacs have died from the AIDS virus, and not only they're dying, their family members are dying because they're becoming infected.

01:46:05 Speaker 1

Edward Tabor and Robert Gerety were the FDA scientists regulating the industry, rolling out the vaccine in southern Africa, and they held the patents. After, they brought the rate of new HIV infections to extremely low levels in the US by halting blood- based transmission. They released this bulletin audaciously claiming that AIDS had never been documented to be transmitted by blood. They urged hemophiliacs to continue buying life- saving factor eight, one year after privately warning the makers that it was causing AIDS. They defended the costly three chemical purification of Hepavax B, and began claiming this four hundred dollar vaccine was what they had rolled out in poor rural African villages.

01:46:50 Speaker 8

But the blood bankers were not, Change agents. And that's true in Canada and the United States and elsewhere. And, the regulators were really blood bankers, regulating blood bankers, because why would you need regulation in blood banking? These are good people trying their best. And as a result, thousands of people died around the world. I think the money trail in blood banking, it really has a couple of.

01:47:23 Speaker 8

Chapters or pieces. One is the plasma side of blood banking, where you donate plasma that is made into a variety of things, not blood, whole blood, But just the plasma itself where, frankly, at least in the United States, you pay donors to put a needle in, you take the blood out, you give the cells back and you keep the plasma. That ended up to be a very dangerous thing because.

01:47:51 Speaker 1

James Tullis, Plasma collection and confirmed he wrote his own regulation. When the immunodeficiency emerged, He speculated that they may have injected the quote donors who constitute human factories with slow viruses. HIV is a lentivirus, Latin for slow virus. However, he justified this with the greater good argument on a cost benefit basis. The tremendous value, which these agents have for the control of various diseases seems to outweigh the hazard. But how does one explain this conclusion to the so-called informed donor, who is the one who is at risk? None of the plasma harvesters admitted to administering immunosuppressive drugs. However, they admit they put donors at risk without informed consent. And, this explains how they somehow obtained the large volume of plasma needed to make a killing.

01:48:47 Speaker 1

Precisely when their donors began suffering an immune system collapse that remains an unsolved mystery. The full proceedings for the nineteen eighty one symposium in New York were only available in libraries. They contain a bombshell. Remember, Offit warned us this vaccine used the most dangerous starting material, and Fauci said you have the responsibility that you might do harm. These proceedings reveal that Fauci's own agency was also taking stabs at making a vaccine from this most dangerous starting material. Yet, they designed the trial in a way that it would be impossible to know if the vaccine killed the participants. They released this list of all the vaccines being tested in nineteen eighty, using that plasma they now admit was heavily contaminated with H I V. None, not even Hillerman's.

01:49:44 Speaker 1

Used his three chemical purification. Thus, by their own admission, all of them carried a high risk of transmitting HIV. Here is Cutter's. Here is Prince's chimp vax. Here is Fauci's. His human trials began in nineteen seventy seven. However, Fauci's scientists struggled to inactivate deadly viruses without harming the antigens needed for the vaccine to work. They reported early lots generated less immune response in man Than in chimpanzees, in an attempt to improve the immunogenicity, they experimented with various formulations. One was tested on young medical staff in Texas, mostly students. Half received the vaccine, half received a placebo. Yet, even though all participants were heterosexuals at low risk for hepatitis and thus had little need for the vaccine anyway, just a couple of months into the trial.

01:50:41 Speaker 1

They vaccinated the entire placebo arm. Ten years later, many medical staff did indeed have AIDS. It was generally dismissed as an occupational hazard from needle sticks. But for Fauci's vaccine, there was no long-term follow-up. And even if there had been, and high rates of AIDS were found, the placebo control arm had been unnecessarily vaccinated, making it impossible to separate causation from correlation. This perfectly demonstrates why skeptics demand true placebo controlled trials with long term follow up, and it explains why the industry is so fiercely opposed to them. Had a true long term vaccinated versus unvaccinated comparison been made, It might have revealed that Fauci's own vaccine gave AIDS to young healthy medical students. This explains why Offit violently opposes placebo controlled trials, calling them cruel.

01:51:37 Speaker 1

He is adamant that all vaccine trials use an existing vaccine in lieu of placebo as the control arm. He argues it would be unethical for some participants to get a placebo offering no protection. However, during the trial of the original rotavirus vaccine, which Offit co-invented, there was no existing vaccine. So he was required to use a placebo. Per the package insert, twenty five children died after receiving his vaccine. Most from unexplainable sudden infant death. If the rate had been lower in the placebo control arm, Offit would have lost his one hundred eighty two million dollar licensing deal with Merck, Who would have also had to write off another three hundred fifty million dollars for the trial. They were saved purely because there were a similar number of deaths in the placebo control arm, But it took a freedom of information act request to reveal his trial design ensured their half a billion dollars was never at risk.

01:52:37 Speaker 1

That's because Offit's placebo contained all the same potentially dangerous ingredients as the vaccine. That even included the animal tissue culture medium, The very ingredient in Cutter's polio vaccine that killed all those children and caused one of the worst biological disasters. Thus, It's impossible to prove if Offit's vaccine was responsible for all those unexplainable deaths during his trial. This man's daughter died within twenty four hours of receiving the vaccine.

01:53:07 Speaker 1

He brought a book, blaming this on the trial's lack of a true placebo control arm. He tried to speak to Offit during a live video podcast.

01:53:16 Speaker 4

Hi. Hey. Hey guys. That's.

01:53:20 Speaker 7

My daughter Oh,

01:53:22 Speaker 8

He's laughing We'd like to talk Can we come in? Can we come in? We brought a book They pulled the shade.

01:53:34 Speaker 7

My daughter died, Within 24 hours of routine vaccinations.

01:53:41 Speaker 1

Watch their reaction inside the studio.

01:53:43 Speaker 9

We have the dark lord of vaccines, The person that the anti- vax xers hate so much. And the reason they hate him is that he saves lives every single day through communication, through vaccine development, through science promotion. And through being an amazing superstar, everybody, you're not gonna believe it. It's Dr. Paul Offit. Wait wait! Look! Look at this! It's an anti-vax protester! Oh is that what that was? Yeah. This is not a joke. They're actually anti-vax activists outside the window right now. And now they're gone 'cause Tom turned them off. This is.

01:54:28 Speaker 9

What we want to talk about too. You hear him?

01:54:31 Speaker 10

Yeah. What is he saying, Zach? I can't.

01:54:32 Speaker 9

I don't know, But Tom's going to make sure that the door is locked and also that Logan's gun is cocked. You spend 25 years of your life developing a vaccine that saves lives. That saves, I think it's been estimated hundreds of lives a day because rotavirus kills children. You do this, you're a passionate advocate for science, you're a pediatrician, you're a good human being, You're a lovely, introverted person who in five minutes I loved talking to. And you get this as a reward.

01:55:05 Speaker 1

Offit confirmed the vaccine debate comes down to placebo- controlled trials.

01:55:09 Speaker 11

So Paul, you start the piece with a statement made by anti- vaccine activists:" Government officials, pharmaceutical companies, public health agencies, scientists and doctors are lying to you about vaccines." So first of all, I can't imagine all of them, Conspiring to lie in the same way that scientists don't even agree. But given that, what are they lying about and do people really believe that?

01:55:35 Speaker 10

I certainly think there is a group of people in this country who do believe the anti- vaccine activists and their tropes. The thinking behind this claim is that vaccine trials are not really placebo controlled. So therefore, because the placebo itself may be dangerous, Then, you can't really tell whether the vaccine is dangerous and therefore, all vaccines might be dangerous. I mean, um, that's where they're coming from. Sadly, They can get at least a subset of people in this country to believe them because we're living in an age whereum conspiracy theories are no longer marginal.

01:56:14 Speaker 1

It takes just 60 seconds to prove that everyone everywhere really is demonstrably lying, About the hepatitis B vaccine safety signal which we examined.

01:56:15 Speaker 1

Search. What date did the CDC use the term AIDS for the first time? You will find a universal consensus: September twenty fourth, nineteen eighty two. This interview with Anthony Fauci states it clearly. On September twenty fourth, nineteen eighty two, the CDC applied a name to the new disease: AIDS. Universities repeat the date, as does the BBC and the Australian government. The US government website confirms. Now, look at this CDC index. Here is the September twenty fourth bulletin, introducing it as a purely sexually transmitted disease, with no mention of vaccines or blood. Scroll back twenty one days to the bulletin entitled Hepatitis B Virus Vaccine Safety. Three weeks before everyone insists the acronym was first used, the CDC wrote the disease quote.

01:57:10 Speaker 1

Is now called acquired immunodeficiency syndrome AIDS. Done. Yes, they are all lying about something as obvious as the date of the bulletin. Today, it's the man with a video claiming the date was September third, who is right, all the scientists claiming September twenty fourth are wrong, even the CDC denies the existence of their very own September third bulletin. Presumably because it proves that even before the disease had a name, The C D C had already figured out that it was caused by a virus in the blood plasma used to make the vaccine, and that it had somehow slipped through chimpanzee safety testing. There is no mention of sexual transmission because the common link was plasma, not sex. It was previously called the four H disease. The first three H's were vaccine plasma donors, the fourth recipients. So this.

01:58:10 Speaker 2

Suggests an unidentified and uncharacterized blood- borne agent. Infectious agents that might be present in donor plasma are most likely to be viruses. Virus transmission by blood or blood products.

01:58:22 Speaker 1

Over the twenty- one days that followed, they came up with a more convenient narrative blaming the victims, and reintroduced it on September twenty- fourth as a sexually transmitted disease. Their first introduction of AIDS is named after the vaccine. They defend the F D A licensed version, which added pepsin and urea, But include this awkward disclaimer about a difference in the early lots used in placebo, controlled trials on gay men. Anybody who sees this bulletin would naturally demand an answer to the keystone question. So the fact that all these scientists who administered the vaccine deny that the September third bulletin exists demonstrates George Carlin's point.

01:59:03 Speaker 2

You don't need a formal conspiracy. When interests converge, these people.